Which closed-end funds own Village Community Development District No 15?
1 active closed-end fund report this security in their latest N-PORT filing, with a combined reported value of $410K. Security type: debt security. Country: United States. CUSIP 92708KAC1 · ISIN US92708KAC18.
Holdings are historical filings (report dates Jun 30, 2026; N-PORT becomes public ~60 days after quarter end), not live positions. Weights are percent of each fund’s net assets. Different instruments of one issuer (shares, bonds, preferreds) are separate securities — see related securities below.
Funds holding this security
| Fund | Category | Weight | Value (USD) | Balance | Fund net assets | Prem/disc | Report date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMN BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust | Municipal Bonds | 0.16% | $410K | 395,000 par | $262M | 6.2% discount | Jun 30, 2026 |
1 positions. Source: SEC Form N-PORT via market-data vendor re-serve. Funds without an N-PORT on file cannot appear here.
Related securities from the same issuer
| Security | Type | Funds holding |
|---|---|---|
| Village Community Development District No 15 | debt security | 3 |
| Village Community Development District No 14 | debt security | 3 |
| Village Community Development District 15, Florida, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2024 | debt security | 3 |
| Village Community Development District No 5 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No 11 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No. 12 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No 13 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No. 13 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No 14 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No 15 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No. 15 | debt security | 1 |
| Village Community Development District No. 15 | debt security | 1 |
Issuer-level search for “Village Community Development District No 15” → · Compare two funds’ portfolios →