Which closed-end funds own Kalispel Tribe of Indians?
6 active closed-end funds report this security in their latest N-PORT filing, with a combined reported value of $5.2M. Security type: debt security. Country: United States. CUSIP 48340PAS1 · ISIN US48340PAS11.
Holdings are historical filings (report dates May 31, 2026 – Jul 31, 2026; N-PORT becomes public ~60 days after quarter end), not live positions. Weights are percent of each fund’s net assets. Different instruments of one issuer (shares, bonds, preferreds) are separate securities — see related securities below.
Funds holding this security
| Fund | Category | Weight | Value (USD) | Balance | Fund net assets | Prem/disc | Report date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMM Franklin Managed Municipal Income Trust | Municipal Bonds | 0.19% | $757K | 750,000 par | $396M | 4.3% discount | Jul 31, 2026 |
| VMO Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust | Municipal Bonds | 0.16% | $1.7M | 1,680,000 par | $1B | 3.4% discount | May 31, 2026 |
| VKQ Invesco Municipal Trust | Municipal Bonds | 0.15% | $1.3M | 1,320,000 par | $879M | 3.4% discount | May 31, 2026 |
| EOT Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust | Municipal Bonds | 0.12% | $396K | 390,000 par | $322M | 9.3% discount | Jun 30, 2026 |
| EVN Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust | Municipal Bonds | 0.08% | $492K | 485,000 par | $645M | 4.0% discount | May 31, 2026 |
| MFM Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund | Municipal Bonds | 0.06% | $504K | 500,000 par | $816M | 10.6% discount | Jul 31, 2026 |
6 positions. Source: SEC Form N-PORT via market-data vendor re-serve. Funds without an N-PORT on file cannot appear here.
Also listed in filings as: KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS PRIORITY DIST WA REVENUE.
Related securities from the same issuer
| Security | Type | Funds holding |
|---|---|---|
| Kalispel Tribe of Indians Priority Dist Wa Revenue | debt security | 2 |
| Kalispel Tribe of Indians | debt security | 1 |
| Kalispel Tribe of Indians | debt security | 1 |
Issuer-level search for “Kalispel Tribe of Indians” → · Compare two funds’ portfolios →